🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."