🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by more than half, following a controversial law change that required local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often spent years generating local support and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.